[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Thread Index]
Re: [fw1-gurus] Query regarding ASA multiple security context Vs checkpoint VSX
Hi,
Security context are clearly Cisco ASA response to virtualisation. The
lack of vpn make it a bit usless in my opinion. I hope that in some
release they will enable it.
For the other solutions, I would say that one is vmware esx(i) .
Checkpoint is selling a Checkpoint "VE" edition design for vmware
virtual machines. You can also use Checkpoint SecurePlateform on each
virtual machine.
I have never try other virtualisation solution with checkpoint product.
This solution doesn't have any kind of features limitation but some
can find limitation in virtualisation technologies itself.
Vincent.
Le 10 mars 09 à 04:07, Gopi Krishna S (gopis) a écrit :
<image001.gif>
Hi Gurus,
I’ve a query regarding the multiple context mode
functionality in ASA comparing with CheckPoints VSX.
In ASA multiple-context mode You can partition a single security
appliance into multiple virtual devices, known as
security contexts. Each context is an independent device, with its
own security policy, interfaces, and administrators.
Multiple contexts are similar to multiple standalone devices. Many
features are supported in multiple context mode,
which include routing tables, firewall features, IPS, and
management. Some features are not supported, which include
VPN and dynamic routing protocols.
Does this is same as CheckPoint VSX which allows to create virtual
systems?? And
Which other CheckPoint’s security appliances support this multiple
security contexts??
Your help is highly appreciated in this regard.
Thank You.
Regards
Gopi Krishna.S
_______________________________________________
fw1-gurus mailing list
fw1-gurus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.phoneboy.com/listinfo.cgi/fw1-gurus-phoneboy.com
_______________________________________________
fw1-gurus mailing list
fw1-gurus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.phoneboy.com/listinfo.cgi/fw1-gurus-phoneboy.com
|